1. I have another scanner and I was checking a person. Also obtained a hit of a phase change at 468kHz. I connected to the electrodes my generator set to 468kHz and after 15 minutes I repeated the test. It became something strange because instead of one big hit on 468kHz I've got 5 small hits around the 468kHz. I concluded that I killed something big which fell apart into several pieces. During the session with a generator that person felt something in the upper abdomen and after already nothing.
In my opinion, a pathogen not hit accurately can change its properties and thereby change the frequency, under which it was detected.
2. I think valid numbers are absolutely hidden in that list. Sometimes the biggest hits could simply be a sigh after a big hit when a person is being grabbed by a frequency or a tiny movement, sniff, swallow or cough. I believe that a significant number of finds are invalid because of that and a significant number are valid gems. It's no way 100% correct and depends also on some practice from the tested person. You are not wasting your time. I m sure. may be: See it as having the valid numbers in the list, is better than not having this option at all. A smaller resolution will also improve things , however time is the trade-off.
3. When scanning/testing we must take into account the occurrence of a phenomena in the environment that can be called artifacts. Both my scanner and FSCAN and Spooky are not free from this problem. The origin of the artifacts may be an external environment or the internal environment resulting from the functioning of the human organism. Until we learn to distinguish between artifacts and normal hits we will have the problems with proper diagnosis, assessment, and how we should use the frequencies. My scanner sends the frequency to a contact electrodes and measures the impedance and phase shift of the body between the electrodes. I suspect that Spooky measures the heart rate so that the both measuring systems are not free of artifacts that we must learn to recognize.
For more details, please check the link:
http://www.spooky2.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=79&t=7390
Comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.