What can I get from the comparison of scan results in two weeks and how to measure the progress in healing?

Spooky2

Updated September 02, 2019 05:59

Yes, given enough scans over time, you can perform statistical analysis. If you are constantly getting a hit for say 76532 Hz, this would indicate that a chronic issue is being worked on by this frequency. If you could accurately identify what it was targeting given additional sources of confirmed data, you may be over time able to associate 76532 Hz with issue X. However, only by having additional test cases where you then can effectively target X with the same frequency would you really know that the association was valid.

Another use would be, that if you were consistently getting scans hits known to be used for condition Y, it would probably be a good idea to get a real diagnostic test done to see if you also had condition Y. This is how one was able to identify early on that they had cancer. However, the diagnostic test and confirmation were done in the traditional sense.

If you take the scan results and apply them over time and repeat, you should be able to make observational changes to the state of your health. Perhaps if tracking your scan results, you will see frequencies that were in each scan not only fade in priority (move down the list of top 20 hits), but then drop off the list entirely. Just some ideas.

For more details, please check the link from:
http://www.spooky2.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=6946

Comments

1 comment

David Peacock
January 25, 2017 12:54

I find it best to represent the acquired data in a graph form. The attached graph shows the results of 15 bio-feedback scans from 76,000 to 152,000 Hz, with the X (Horizontal) Axis of BFB frequencies plotted against the Y Axis (Vertical) representing the theoretical frequency expected by pure chance = 76,000 + 76,000 divided by the (Total no. of Bfb frequency values, multipled by the Bfb number result when the Bfb results are in an ascending frequency numbered list) Quite a mouthful to explain the mathematical details, but worth the result when all of the closely grouped frequencies can readily be seen, with the very closest grouping exhibiting near vertical regions.

Dave Peacock

.

0