What is the maximum number of frequencies that can be imprinted onto a holographic sticker?

I'll give you my perspective, and maybe it will help you arrive at your own conclusion.

A single well-defined frequency can have a beautiful structure -- see cymatics.
A few well-defined frequencies can be also beautiful and structured -- like a musical chord.
We tend to be able to hear when multiple frequencies do not sound good together, and their structure usually is not well defined either.
When you get too many frequencies co-existing together, it will approach noise - like white or pink noise.
Sooner or later, you lose the advantage of having a well defined structure from imprinting.

Furthermore, 3 minutes of imprinting is a relative standard and while I won't go into why, there is only so many frequencies you can get into an imprint over 3 minutes. Once you go past this mark, the starting frequencies will start to get washed out and replaced by the most freshly transmitted frequencies.

I'll give you an example for those who wish to argue this. If you play a Beethoven song to water and then flash freeze a sample and examine the crystal structure, you will get a nice crystalized fingerprint as a result.
If you then take the same water and play a heavy metal song; and repeat the flash freeze process, you will no longer see the beautiful crystalized fingerprint. Rather the disorganized imprint of the most recent song will have taken its place.
Yes, the water will remember the Beethoven, but it will be like a distant memory.

So, you could choose to do one frequency at 3 minutes for maximum strength, or many at 0.5 seconds as I have seen discussed in these groups which would give you a maximum of around 360 frequencies with minor strength.

However, when you use any waveform other than a sinewave, you are also imprinting additional frequencies (harmonics).
The use of say the Square H Bomb that has been referenced with 240 frequencies at 0.5 seconds each, will create an imprint of roughly 4k frequencies.
Not only will you never know which frequency is responsible for any observed effect, but you also drown out whatever frequency you may have done work with a lot of other frequencies that may not contribute at all.

In frequency work, more is not usually better. Many users tend to toss more at a problem because few frequencies are correct to start with.

For more details, please check the link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/spooky2/posts/2237686459726578/

When performing a biofeedback scan, should all databases be checked under the program or just a few you like?
It doesn't matter. The frequencies found in the BFB will be unique to your body. It does not use any database to find them. You can do a reverse lookup to see if found frequencies correlate with any in the databases. You can do this at any time by selecting/deselecting desired databases after BFB is finished and then using the reverse lookup tool. However, the database is full of frequencies with all sorts of uses, especially those below 20,000 Hz frequencies. In my opinion, the tool is best used with the BFB database to see if frequencies showed up in your previous scans. However, it can be interesting to do with the different databases. However, keep in mind that it is not for diagnosis.

For more details, please check the link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/spooky2/posts/2237409196420971/