The main difference between the S2 Advanced Kit vs. the Generator X Essentials Kit is the generator's capability and the biofeedback method you have access to.
With the Advanced Kit, yes you get 4 generators. These generators are very capable, but if you do not have the correct frequencies or a good methodology to make use of all 4, you may not get out of them what they could offer.
With the Generator X Essentials Kit, you get 2 generators in one, which replicates much of what the XM does -- albeit with more resolution and a higher top end frequency limit.
The biggest difference is the biofeedback scan.
If you want to use the same methodology that the Advanced Kit would employ, you can still do this with the two generators of the GX -- you just may have to adapt what would run on 4 generators down to 2.
If you find yourself down the road needing 4 generators to perform what you wish, you could always add two more XMs to the GX to obtain this capability without having to buy another GX.
I have found that the GX coupled with a version 2.0 remote is a powerful combination. The XM with a version 2.0 remote is also very powerful, but I'm seeing that the extra resolution that the GX affords; for which the v2.0 remote can actually make use of, may actually improve efficacy rates over the same frequencies ran via the XM and a v2.0 remote.
When dealing with biofeedback scan frequencies that are above the 5 MHz limit of the XM, the difference in efficacy rate becomes more apparent. Yes, the XM can hit the same frequencies when using a wave cycle multiplier, but the GX does it better and this seems to translate into appreciable results.
Couple that with the GX's ability to conduct a much better and larger range biofeedback scan, and you can obtain directly from the body what frequencies to use and this is probably more key.
Yes you could do a biofeedback scan with the Advanced Kit, but this was limited to the older pulse method which don't get me wrong still has value.
The pulse scans took longer and if your pulse or heart rate was not in a co-operative mood, can sometimes be a challenge to extract data from to use.
Couple this with the fact that because the pulse based method is governed by the speed of the heart, we could only scan so much within a limited period of time.
The GX can scan in 6 minutes 200 times more frequency range than the pulse which takes over an hour.
This is the biggest value you will have having ordered the GX Essential's kit.
Given that cancer is a very broad term used to describe many forms of cell replication failure, the source can be from many different things.
Rife appeared to have found the source for Cancer (the BX virus) and this may have very well been true for many of the cancers of the time. However, I feel that today, we have many more sources to create strife in the body which results in what is termed cancer.
It behooves you to be able to scan the body and ask it what else can I do to try an deal with the source of the issue, and you have made a wise selection in this case.
To summarize, you have obtained the best that is available from Spooky2 at this time. You can always pair it with 2 more XMs if you wish to have the capability to run 4 parallel programs -- the XM is still very viable.
The protocols you are looking at can still be ran on the new equipment, but the biofeedback data you can obtain is far far better than what you would have been limited to with just the Advanced Kit.
If I were in your position, I would have made the same choice and would be working towards understanding the protocols I would be interesting in running. While I researched, I would start with terrain on one of the GX generators and conduct biofeedback scans on the other and apply the results, as I learned more about what it is that makes up Spooky2.
For more details, please check:
https://www.spooky2.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9716
Comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.