Can you explain why it’s recommended to put water to imprint on the transmitter while putting substances on the receiver coil?

1. I may not have this right, but my current understanding is…

The energy flows from the transmitter to the receiver, then back. There is no scalar field until it hits the receiver and it returns back to the transmitter.

Therefore, in order to add a substance’s information to the field, the first entry point is the receiver’s coil (input coil). That information is then carried back to the transmitter. Once at the transmitter, the information can be imprinted to whatever is on the transmitter’s coil (output coil).

I did one experiment to test the properties of the input coil vs. output coil in regards to structuring water. I’ll post a thread on this. It did seem to confirm that the input coil on the receiver behaves differently than the output coil.

2. It is said that the magnetic scalar field is what transports and interacts with biological information; hence, the use of the coils for this work.

When you use just one transmitter and receiver pair, the magnetic scalar fields are out of phase with each other. If you were to have two receivers in resonance with a transmitter, it would be better to use the two receivers to add and imprint with as they are in phase with each other.

I can not confirm the last bit there yet, as I do not have a 2nd receiver to work with. However, this suggests that the scalar field has to be established in order to sample the information of a substance (hence the use of a receiver coil), but that either a second receiver coil or the transmitter coil can be used to imprint once the information is in the field.