If you lower the range, but at the same time you raise the number of samples, then you don't get a time reduction.
Try a scan from 76000 to 95000 with a step size of 20, and then another scan from 95000 to 114000 with a step size of 25. With these step sizes, you won't get holes
Anyway, It is better to have a less accurate scan than not to have a scan at all.
For more details, please check the link: http://www.spooky2.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4802
How to shorten the Biofeedback Scan time? I narrow the frequency range in half, but it turns out there is not much change in time.
Have more questions? Submit a request
Please sign in to leave a comment.
0 Comments